| |
Shapes
|
Round
By far the most preferred diamond shape, the round-brilliant
cut is also the most optically brilliant because of its 360-degree
symmetrical shape. A round brilliant is a great choice if
you want the most sparkle and the most enduring classic shape.
The round shape has been cut for centuries, but in 1919, Marcel
Tolkowsky defined specific angles and proportions to yield
the most brilliant diamond, which form the basis for the modern
"Ideal" cut round-brilliant diamond. Round-brilliant
diamonds are the only shape to have this ideal proportion
defined. The round silhouette works with almost every mounting,
from classic solitaires to the most avant-garde designs. Rounds
can be set into four or six prongs, based on the design of
the setting, or into bezel mountings (a metal band that runs
around the edge of the diamond to hold it securely in the
setting). In general, if the round brilliant has an Ideal
cut or Very Good cut, you want the setting to have the least
amount of metal around the stone so that it is held securely
but does not cover up too much of the diamond and block light
from entering the stone. |
| |
|
|
Princess
The princess cut is a modern classic of clean, square lines
and beautiful sparkle. This shape is the perfect choice if
you prefer a square or rectangular outline but want the brilliance
of a round. Developed in the 1970s, the princess cut is now
second only to the round brilliant in popularity. The cutting
of this diamond combines the step-cutting of the emerald cut
with the triangular facets of the brilliant cut and is cut
with right-angle corners. Although most prefer a square outline,
some stones are cut with a slightly more rectangular outline.
The princess cut works beautifully as a solitaire but also
looks great paired with side stones, especially trillions
or smaller princess-cut diamonds. It is important to protect
the more vulnerable corners with a V-shaped prong at each
point. |
| |
|
|
Asscher
This elegant shape is a variation on a classic emerald cut,
developed in 1902 by the venerable Asscher brothers in Holland.
The Asscher cut is not a traditional choice but has gained
deserved exposure recently because of celebrities wearing
the cut. The uniqueness of this shape is defined by the pavilion,
or bottom part of the diamond, that has a "scissor cut"
with all facets step-cut down toward the culet, or point on
the bottom. The blocked corners add to its geometric appeal,
making the diamond appear almost octagonal. It is usually
cut to a square outline as opposed to rectangular. This diamond
shape is beautiful in a simple solitaire or in a setting that
has simple geometric lines or side stones such as baguettes.
Ideally, the setting for an Asscher cut should not hide the
unique blocked corners. |
| |
|
|
Marquise
The marquise cut is a regal, elongated shape with tapering
points at both ends. Its shape tends to flatter the finger,
making it appear longer. When choosing a marquise cut, the
length-to-width ratio should be considered. Usually a ratio
of 2:1.0 is preferred, meaning that the length of the stone
should be about 2 times the width of the diamond. However,
like all fancy shapes, personal preference prevails, and some
may prefer a shorter, wider outline or longer, thinner shape.
Just look for good symmetry to ensure overall beauty no matter
what outline you prefer. This shape works in a simple solitaire
setting or looks beautiful with side stones, especially baguette
or trillion shapes. A marquise-cut diamond should be mounted
with six prongs: four positioned on the sides to hold the
body of the stone securely and two V-shaped prongs to protect
the points at either end, the most vulnerable part of the
diamond. |
| |
|
|
Emerald
The emerald-cut diamond is among the most classic of diamond
shapes. Its clean lines come from step-cutting, or parallel
line facets. It is always cut with blocked corners and is
usually cut to a rectangular outline, although a few are cut
to be more square. Because of its simpler faceting structure,
larger inclusions are sometimes more visible to the unaided
eye, so diamonds cut in this shape usually need to be higher
clarity (I1 or I2 clarities should probably be avoided). Length-to-width
ratios should be considered when choosing an emerald cut:
Usually a 1.50:1.00 ratio is preferred, meaning that the length
of the stone should be about 1½ times the width of
the diamond. However, like all fancy shapes, personal preference
prevails, and some may prefer a squarer outline, or longer,
thinner rectangle. An emerald cut is loved by purists and
looks especially wonderful set in platinum, in a simple setting
or a baguette side-stone setting. |
| |
|
|
Radiant
The radiant cut is a beautiful combination of the classic
emerald cut and the sparkle of the round brilliant. The radiant
cut is similar to the princess cut but is usually (though
not always) a more rectangular outline and has blocked corners
like those of an emerald cut. The cutting is a combination
of the step-cutting of the emerald-cut diamond with some triangular
faceting of the brilliant cut. The radiant cut is dramatic
as a solitaire but also looks great paired with side stones
such as baguettes, trillions, or princess shapes. A radiant-cut
stone should be set with special prongs to hold the blocked
corners securely. |
| |
|
|
Cushion
The cushion cut is an unusual diamond shape and an interesting
alternative to an oval- or princess-cut diamond. Because these
are relatively rare, this shape is for someone who wants something
few people possess. The modern cushion shape is based on an
antique cushion cut, which is a combination of round and square
outline with a softened square or "pillow" shape.
A cushion-cut may be squarer with length and width in equal
proportion, or may have a slightly elongated outline, depending
on the individual stone and the wearer's preference. As a
solitaire, it makes a statement and also looks wonderful paired
with side stones such as baguettes. A cushion-cut diamond
setting should have at least four secure prongs. |
| |
|
|
Pear
The pear shape is a beautiful, feminine diamond shape with
a rounded end on one side and a tapering point at the other.
It is lovely as the center stone in a ring or outstanding
as a pendant or pair of drop earrings. As with many fancy
shapes, length-to-width ratio should be considered. Usually
a ratio of 1.5:1.0 is preferred, meaning that the length of
the stone should be about 1½ times the width of the
diamond. Some may prefer a shorter, wider outline or a longer,
thinner shape. Good symmetry is a must for pear-cut diamonds.
This will ensure that light is reflected evenly, especially
in the point. The asymmetrical shape should be considered
when setting a pear cut, which looks beautiful as a solitaire,
or with side stones, especially smaller pear-cut stones or
baguettes. A pear-shaped diamond should be mounted in a special
setting with five prongs: two to hold the rounded end, two
to hold the curved sides of the stone securely, and one V-shaped
prong to protect the point at the other end, the most vulnerable
part of the diamond. |
| |
|
|
Oval
The oval cut is most similar a round-brilliant cut and combines
the round's sparkle with a flattering, elongated outline.
It makes a good choice for someone who wants a unique shape
but loves the fire and brilliance of a round diamond. The
length-to-width ratio of ovals can vary based on personal
preference. Generally a ratio of 1.5:1.0 is preferred, meaning
that the length of the stone should be about 1½ times
the width of the diamond. However, like all fancy shapes,
personal choice should guide you; some may prefer a shorter,
wider outline or a longer, thinner shape. The relatively symmetrical
shape lends itself well to a variety of mounting styles. Most
oval cuts look great in any mounting meant for a round brilliant
as long as the setting that holds the diamond has six prongs
properly spaced for security. |
| |
|
|
Heart
The heart-shaped diamond is the most romantic of diamond shapes.
It is similar to the pear shape but has a cleft in the rounded
end that forms the lobes of the heart. The complexity of the
shape requires skilled cutting to ensure proper brilliance.
Symmetry is a big consideration for this shape, as the outline
needs to have a pleasing, obvious heart outline apparent in
the setting. The lobes should be rounded (not pointed) and
clearly defined. Heart-shaped diamonds should be mounted in
special settings with five prongs: two at the lobes of the
heart, two on the sides of the heart, and a V-shaped prong
to protect the point of the heart, the most vulnerable place
on the diamond. |
| |
|
|
Trillion
The trillion cut is a dramatic cut that makes a bold statement.
It was developed in the 1970s as a variation of the radiant
cut, combining step-cutting and brilliant faceting. While
often used as side stones, this cut is rarely used for the
center diamond, so it is somewhat scarce in larger sizes.
The triangular shape needs to be considered with the style
of mounting and would probably go best in a simple solitaire
or geometric setting that works with the unique shape. The
trillion cut will require a special setting that has V-shaped-prongs
to protect the corners of the diamond. |
|
|
|